Signal vs. WhatsApp: Melyik Messenger tartja tulajdonképpen privátnak a csevegéseit?
2026. június 24. · 2 perc olvasás · Megjegyzések
Mindkét alkalmazás azt állítja, hogy végpontok közötti titkosítást használ. De a titkosítás csak egy része a történetnek. Íme, mi választja el őket valójában.
Mit jelent valójában a végpontok közötti titkosítás?
- End-to-end encryption means only you and the person you're messaging can read the contents of your messages. Not the app company, not your mobile carrier, not the government — unless they get into your actual phone.
- Both Signal and WhatsApp use end-to-end encryption for message content. On this point, they are equal. The difference is everything else.
A metaadat probléma
- Even if WhatsApp can't read your messages, it can — and does — collect metadata: who you talk to, how often, at what times, your location, your device, your contacts list.
- Meta (WhatsApp's parent company) uses this data to build advertising profiles and shares it across Instagram and Facebook.
- Signal collects almost none of this. The only data Signal holds about you is your phone number and the date you last connected.
Nyílt forráskód vs. zárt forrás
- Signal's code is open source — anyone can read it, audit it, and verify it does what it claims. Security researchers around the world have done exactly this.
- WhatsApp's code is closed. You have to take Meta's word for it that the encryption is correctly implemented and that no backdoors exist. Given Meta's track record with user data, that's a lot of trust.
A jel gyakorlati hátránya
- The only real drawback: your contacts need to have Signal too. You can't send a Signal message to a WhatsApp user.
- Signal has grown significantly — it now has over 100 million users. Many people already have it.
- The practical approach: keep WhatsApp for group chats with family who won't switch, move sensitive conversations to Signal.
Advantage: jel – nagy különbséggel, ha az adatvédelem fontos Önnek.
